I love getting on Factcheck.org after the "debates" and such to see who's lying, fudging, etc. But apparantly facts are up for debate now too. I found this article to be real interesting on how "facts" are certain facts were determined and why McCain is so obsessed with "94" when "52" would have the same effect...
The central question of article is: (this is quoted)
"What if McCain adjusted his campaign claims to conform to the fact-checkers’ objections? In a number of cases he could easily satisfy their criticisms and still have a devastating attack against Obama. Would they then pronounce those claims accurate?"
Read the article (Click Me!)
Maybe Big John should take the advice, thoughts?
P.S. #1 - And spare me the bias talk, all of you know Im a John Wayne McCain supporter. And yes, Im sure this same artice could be written the other way around. Any yes #2, Im sure there are misstatements on the McCain side that cant be "fixed" by adjustments, same with Sen. Obama. And yes.... blah blah blah.
P.S. #2 - ATB, this is how you get away without posting the WHOLE article... Tease 'em!